Tick-borne zoonotic hemotropic diseases co-infection in human from Western Venezuela
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32776/revbiomed.v37.i2.1377Keywords:
Tick-borne, Zoonotic diseases, Human-coinfection, Western-VenezuelaAbstract
Introduction. Tick-borne zoonotic diseases, caused by hemotropic organisms of the families Anaplasmataceae and Babesiidae, are of great extent in most countries of the American tropical region, generating severe and frequent outbreaks in human populations.
Objective. This study aimed to investigate the occurrence of tick-borne parasitic infections and co-infections caused by the genera Anaplasma, Babesia and Ehrlichia in humans exposed to tick-bites through farming or residence in rural areas of Western Venezuela.
Materials and methods. Parasitological and molecular (PCR) methodologies in peripheral blood samples were used to detect tick-borne organisms (Anaplasma, Babesia and Ehrlichia) in human populations from rural areas. A total of 346 blood samples were evaluated. These included, 226 of patients referred to a diagnostic center in Mérida state coming from different health units and, 120 from schoolchildren and parents sampled in three communities of Barinas state.
Results. The occurrence of infection and co-infection by Anaplasma sp, Babesia sp and/or Ehrlichia sp across different age-groups, was recorded. Anaplasma sp. infection was detected with higher frequency in all the study-groups. Anaplasma and Babesia are widespread and well adapted-infections to a higher degree than Ehrlichia. Particularly, in the group studied from Barinas’ state statistical analyses revealed an epidemiological relationship between Anaplasma and Babesia co-infection, showing the higher prevalence (92% and 95% respectively) and strong association in infected individuals, indicating ancient-relationships with tick-vector.
Conclusion. These findings highlight the significant public health burden of tick-borne diseases in rural Western Venezuela and the need for enhance surveillance and control measures to protect vulnerable populations.
References
1. de la Fuente J, Estrada-Pena A, Venzal JM, Kocan KM, Sonenshine DE. Overview: Ticks as vectors of pathogens that cause disease in humans and animals. Front Biosci. 2008; May 1;13:6938-46. doi: 10.2741/3200
2. Wilson ML, Adler GH, Spielman A. Correlation between abundance of deer and that of the deer tick, Ixodes dammini (Acari: Ixodidae). Ann Ent Soc Amer 1985; 78(2):172-6, https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/78.2.172
3. González-Sanz M, Fhogartaigh C N. Zoonotic Infections. Book Chapter; 2019; 35:290-6. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801740.003.0046.
4. Koren O, Chaves L F. The land-use land-cover change–emerging infectious disease nexus reconsidered. Biosci. 2025; 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaf045.
5. Otte J, Pica-Ciamarra U. Emerging infectious zoonotic diseases: The neglected role of food animals. One Hlt. 2021; Sep 3;13:100323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100323.
6. Wang N, Liu S. Modeling of periodic input Ornstein-Uhlenbeck temperature-tick-borne disease transmission coupling mechanism under climate change. Acta Trop. 2025; Jan;261:107490. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2024.107490.
7. Randolph SE, Gern L, Nuttall PA. Co-feeding ticks: Epidemiological significance for tick-borne pathogen transmission. Parasitol Today. 1996; Dec;12(12):472-9. doi: 10.1016/s0169-4758(96)10072-7.
8. Voordouw MJ. Co-feeding transmission in Lyme disease pathogens. Parasitol. 2015; Feb;142(2):290-302. doi: 10.1017/S0031182014001486.
9. Nah K, Magpantay FMG, Bede-Fazekas Á, Röst G, Trájer AJ, Wu X, Zhang X, Wu J. Assessing systemic and non-systemic transmission risk of tick-borne encephalitis virus in Hungary. PLoS One. 2019; Jun 4;14(6):e0217206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217206.
10. Diuk-Wasser MA, Vannier E, Krause PJ. Coinfection by the tick-borne pathogens Babesia microti and Borrelia burgdorferi: ecological, epidemiological and clinical consequences. Trends Parasitol. 2016; 32(1): 30–42. doi:10.1016/j.pt.2015.09.008.
11. Krause PJ. Human babesiosis. Int J Parasitol. 2019; Feb;49(2):165-174. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2018.11.007.
12. Payne RC, Scott JM. Anaplasmosis and babesiosis in El Salvador. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1982; May;14(2):75-80. doi: 10.1007/BF02282584.
13. Guglielmone AA. Epidemiology of babesiosis and anaplasmosis in South and Central America. Vet Parasitol. 1995; Mar;57(1-3):109-19. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(94)03115-d.
14. Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Bonilla-Aldana DK, Idarraga-Bedoya SE, Garcia-Bustos JJ, Cardona-Ospina JA, Faccini-Martínez ÁA. Epidemiology of zoonotic tick-borne diseases in Latin America: ¿Are we just seeing the tip of the iceberg? F1000Res. 2019 Dec 31;7:1988. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17649.2.
15. Stich R, Bantle, JA, Kocan, K M, Fekete, A. Detection of Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) in hemolymph of Dermacentor andersoni (Acari: Ixodidae) with the Polymerase Chain Reaction. J. Med. Entomol. 1993; 30(4):781-788. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/30.4.781.
16. Añez-Rojas N, Romero O, Valbuena H, Crisante G, Rojas A, Bolívar, A M, Añez N. Detection of Anaplasma marginale Transplacental Transmission in Asymptomatic Cattle. Rev Cient, FCV-LUZ; 2010; 20(4):377-82. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=95916179007.
17. Alhassan A, Pumidonming W, Okamura M, Hirata H, Battsetseg B, Fujisaki K, et al. Development of a single-round and multiplex PCR method for the simultaneous detection of Babesia caballi and Babesia equi in horse blood. Vet Parasitol. 2005; Apr 20;129(1-2):43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.12.018.
18. Añez N, Rojas A, Crisante G, Abello J, Zambrano C, Quiñonez M. Human babesiosis in Western-Venezuela. Case Reports. CientMed; 2020; 1(27):1-6. ISSN-e: 2665-0479.
19. Murphy G L, Murphy SA, Whitworth LC, Fox JC, Kocan AA. A molecular and serologic survey of Ehrlichia canis, E. chaffeensis, and E. ewingii in dogs and ticks from Oklahoma. Vet Parasitol. 1998; Nov 27;79(4):325-39. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(98)00179-4.
20. Anderson, JF, The natural history of ticks. Med. Clin. 2002; 86 (2): 205–18. http://refhub.elsevie.com(S0001-706x24)00371-1/sb23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-7125(03)00083-X
21. Chen SM, Dumler JS, Bakken JS, Walker DH. Identification of a granulocytotropic Ehrlichia species as the etiologic agent of human disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1994; Mar;32(3):589-95. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.3.589-595.1994.
22. Ismail N, Bloch KC, McBride JW. Human ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis. Clin Lab Med. 2010; Mar;30(1):261-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2009.10.004.
23. Krause PJ, Lepore T, Sikand VK, Gadbaw J, Burke G, Telford S, et al. Atovaquone and azithromycin for the treatment of babesiosis. N Eng J Med, 2003; Nov 16;343(20):1454-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011163432004.
24. Herc E, Pritt B, Huizenga T, Douce R, Hysell M, Newton D, et al., Probable Locally Acquired Babesia divergens-Like Infection in Woman, Michigan, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018; Aug;24(8):1558–60. doi: 10.3201/eid2408.180309.
25. Homer MJ, Aguilar-Delfín I, Telford S, Krause PJ, Persing DH. Babesiosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000; Jul;13(3):451-69. doi: 10.1128/CMR.13.3.451.
26. Melendez R. Babesiosis: An emerging zoonosis in temperate and tropical zones. A Review. Rev. Cient. 2000. FCV-LUZ, 10(1):13-8.
27. Gray JS, Weiss LM. (2008) Babesia microti. In: Khan, N. (Ed.), Emerging Protozoan Pathogens. Taylor and Francis, Abingdon, UK, 2008; pp. 303–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2008.02.001
28. Gao Y, Añez N, Chaves LF. High Spatial Resolution Ensemble Species Distribution Modeling of Rhodnius prolixus, Vector of Chagas Disease, in Western Venezuela. GeoHealth, 2026 (In press).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Nestor Añez, Dra. Gladys Crisante, Dra. Agustina Rojas, M.Sc. Nestor Anez Rojas, Dr. J Y Yepez, Dr. H. Parada

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this magazine accept the following terms:
Authors will keep their copyright and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License that allows third parties to share the work whenever its author is indicated and his first publication in this magazine. The authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (eg, deposit it in an institutional telematic file or publish it in a monographic volume) whenever the initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and advised to disseminate their work through the Internet (eg in institutional telematic archives or on their website) after the submission has been accepted and published, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work.
(See The effect of open access)







